Topic: final animation
Committee Members present:
Prof. Linda Wilson-Pauwels
Prof. Dave Mazierski
Michael Corrin
Geraldine Longo
Animation changes
NGF_s001_q001_s001
Joyce: This looked really bad when I tried it, because having three insets and the Margot drawing created way too much visual noise. It was especially strange because there were now too many hands on screen and there isn't enough contrast between the images to differentiate between the insets and the main image. It might work better if they were more schematic, but due to time constraints, I am unable to redo the drawings. So I am keeping it the way it was before!
NGF_s002_q001_s003
NGF_s002_q003_s003
NGF_s002_q001_s001
Labeling changes
NGF_s002_q001_s003
NGF_s002_q002_s001
NGF_s002_q003_s001
NGF_s002_q004_s001
NGF_s003_q001_s001
NGF_s003_q001_s003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vesalius Trust presentation ideas
- NGF binding to trkA
- DRG with pronociceptive
Say something about Toronto program just finished and animations will be submitted next year.
- Do breakdown of a few frames
- DoF and visual cues to maintain attention,
- Visually framing different areas on screen using DoF and palette.
- Design of composition rather than technical breakdown.
- NGF_s002_q004_s001: Inset part use limited colour palette and DoF to focus attention to raise certain elements to foreground.
Colour palette - break down
Show snippets for each environment
NGF-trkA vesicles formation
NGF_s003_q001_s003 - could be another shot
Possible Pfizer contact
David Gold - Pfizer
Mitac - funding agency
No comments:
Post a Comment